Europe diverts climate funds for defense

The current newsletter examines how Europe's defense expenditures are undermining its climate crisis mitigation efforts.For unrestricted access to climate and energy updates, please consider subscribing.

Europe reallocates climate funds for military purposes.

The urgency for Europe to establish a war economy has resulted in the diversion of essential funds that are crucial for addressing another pressing issue: climate change.

The reallocation of billions of euros from development finance, which is intended to combat the repercussions of floods, droughts, and cyclones in less affluent nations, poses risks of exacerbating inflation within Europe, increasing immigration, and diminishing the bloc's international reputation.

"We are mutually dependent on these countries," stated Gareth Redmond-King, head of the international program at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, a nonprofit organization.

In the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has revealed intentions to reduce aid spending by £6 billion ($7.6 billion) to accommodate heightened military expenditures. Germany plans to decrease its development finance by nearly $1 billion, while the Netherlands has announced cuts amounting to €2.4 billion ($2.5 billion). Similar measures are being adopted by governments across Europe, including those of Finland, Sweden, and Switzerland.

Redmond-King noted that this reduction in funding could have significant repercussions for a variety of soft commodities in nations that export to Europe. A decline in climate disaster protections is likely to lead to increased prices for products such as coffee, cocoa, and bananas. He also cautioned that current spending reductions could result in higher climate-related costs in the future.

According to the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, the UK imports 40% of its food from abroad, with half of that sourced from regions vulnerable to rising temperatures, floods, and other climate change effects.

David Miliband, a former Labour foreign secretary and current chief executive of the International Rescue Committee, has expressed concerns regarding these developments The UK's decision to withdraw development finance has been described as a significant setback to Britain's esteemed status as a global leader in humanitarian and development efforts. In a related development, Anneliese Dodds, the UK's minister for international development, has resigned in protest against this decision.

Ironically, the withdrawal of western governments from development finance may inadvertently allow nations deemed hostile by Europe to gain soft power in strategically vital regions, as noted by Redmond-King.

"The global landscape has shifted considerably in the past month, and it is undeniable that we must increase defense spending," he remarked. However, by reducing climate aid to developing nations, "we risk eliminating a stabilizing force in those countries, thereby creating an opening for others—such as Russia—to intervene."

The decline in development finance from Europe compounds the challenges posed by the policies of former US President Donald Trump, which included a freeze on foreign aid and the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development. This agency was responsible for managing $43 billion in foreign aid in 2023.

The reduction in development budgets comes just three months after the COP29 summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, where affluent nations reached a crucial agreement to provide $300 billion annually in climate aid to less wealthy countries.

This commitment now faces significant uncertainty.

"It will be considerably more challenging to fulfill the commitments made in Baku," stated Redmond-King.

In the meantime, investors are distancing themselves from stocks linked to climate spending. The S&P Global Clean Energy Index has experienced a decline of approximately 40% since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, while the S&P Global 1200 Aerospace & Defense Index has surged by 64% during the same timeframe.