This is article likely describes a recent development in the field of thermobaric weapons, which are not actually hydrogen bombs, but rather a type of explosive that operates on a different principle. Thermobaric weapons, sometimes also called fuel-air explosives or vacuum bombs, use a combination of fuel and oxygen from the surrounding air to create a high-pressure shock wave and intense heat.
92004AB0-4983-4441-AC21FC2D4FEDCEDC_source.jpg
Magnesium hydride, the substance mentioned in the article, can indeed be used to create a powerful thermobaric reaction. When magnesium hydride is ignited, it decomposes into magnesium and hydrogen gas. The hydrogen quickly combines with the surrounding oxygen, creating a fuel-air mixture that ignites and causes a significant explosion. This type of explosive is known for its high energy output and long duration of the fireball, which can be more than twice the temperature of TNT and can sustain for several milliseconds to seconds.
Thermobaric weapons are considered a form of conventional warfare and are not nuclear in nature. They do not produce the same kind of explosive yield or radioactive fallout as a nuclear weapon. Instead, their destructive power comes from the intense heat and pressure generated by the explosion, which can be particularly effective against structures and personnel in confined spaces, as well as light and unarmored vehicles.
The research and development of such weapons are of interest to military analysts due to their potential to cause significant damage while avoiding the political and environmental consequences of using nuclear weapons. However, it is essential to note that the use of any weapon of mass destruction is governed by international laws and conventions, and the development of new types of explosives does not inherently mean they will be used in warfare.
The distinction between thermobaric weapons and hydrogen bombs is crucial. Hydrogen bombs, or thermonuclear weapons, rely on the fusion of hydrogen isotopes to produce a much more powerful and destructive explosion than a conventional atomic bomb, which relies on the fission of uranium or plutonium. Thermobaric weapons are not new and have been in use since the 20th century, whereas the development and use of hydrogen bombs are strictly regulated by international treaties, such as the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), which China has signed but not yet fully ratified.
While the advancement in thermobaric technology is notable and may influence military strategies, it is important to maintain a clear understanding of the differences between these types of weapons and their implications for international security and conflict resolution.